Volume 96, Issue 22
Friday, October 4, 2002

Search the Archives:

HOME
PHOTO GALLERY

COMICS
SUBMIT LETTER
CONTESTS
ADVERTISING
VOLUNTEERS
ABOUT US
ARCHIVES
LINKS



Erotic wrestling a sin?

Where's Chip?
Dale Wyatt
A&E Editor

For a well educated human being, there are a lot of things I don't understand.

Things like physics, other languages and how the movie Weekend at Bernie's ever got the thumbs-up are just some of the things that confuse me.

There is, however, one thing I have never understood at all – how anyone who watches wrestling, like World Wrestling Entertainment, can be homophobic.

Let's take a close look at what wrestling actually is.

At its core, WWE is comprised of a bunch of steroid-injected macho men in tight shorts – let's face it, underwear – that, if worn at the beach, would cause most people's stomachs to turn. After dressing, they march out of a tunnel, flexing their oiled muscles, strutting down a runway to theme music.

Once the wrestlers reach the ring, they are joined by another oily person. They then proceed to wrestle each other until one ends up on top – kind of sounds like a game I tried to get my girlfriend to play once.

To recap, the lengthy matches consist of two giant men in their underwear rolling around trying to get on top of one another in front of dozens of TV cameras.

See what I'm getting at?

Here is my major problem, beyond the simple fact that, to begin with, homophobia is a disease caused by an extreme lapse in intelligence.

When two consenting men decide to partake in similar less-dressed-up acts behind closed doors, and no TV crews are around, it is considered wrong to a homophobic. Yet, if the two men wanted to do the same in front of a camera so people can pay to watch it, it's considered OK. Something just doesn't seem right about that.

Almost no sport exists which doesn't involve some kind of male-on-male contact. Baseball, basketball and football are all infamous for the obligatory butt slap and hockey involves a group hug after a goal. So why are none of these simple harmless acts frowned upon? If people are willing to accept these acts, then how can anyone justify homophobia? The simple answer is – you can't.

What two consenting individuals of any gender decide to do behind closed doors away from the public doesn't affect anyone. However, what happens on TV in front of an audience does.

In that respect, if you truly are homophobic, you should be outraged by wrestling. Make up some signs and go protest. After all, would you want your children watching such filth?

Before all you wrestling fans bombard me with hate mail, take a moment to consider this – I have no problem with wrestling or homosexuality and everything I said about what happens in a wrestling match is true. Given that, what's making you mad?

MORE A&E HEADLINES

Contact The Arts and Entertainment Department

© 2002 THE GAZETTE